COVID-19 Government Assistance

If you are like me, you have been receiving an absolute overload of news both on what is actually occurring with the spread of the COVID-19 virus, as well as what the Government is doing to support everyone in this highly unusual situation.

With that in mind, I thought it would be worthwhile to put together a brief email summarising some of the major Government assistance initiatives (please note that due to the limited applicability of some of the initiatives and my desire to keep this email to a relatively short length, the below list is not to be taken as a comprehensive coverage of all the items available).



For Businesses – Irrespective of whether your turnover has fallen

Cash flow Boost for business – In an attempt to keep businesses operational, the ATO will provide tax free cash flow boosts of between $20,000 and $100,000.  These payments will in effect pay up to 100% of the tax that the business has withheld from their employee’s wages and salaries (as well as from a few other less common payments such as compensation payments).

This payment will be delivered via a credit against the businesses BAS obligations on 28th April & 28th July 2020 (assuming the business lodges their BAS quarterly).

Note that the minimum payment a business will receive is $10,000 for each of these periods, irrespective of how much tax they are withholding from their staff.  As such, small business operators may be entitled to receive quite a sizable boost when compared to the size of their business operations.



For Businesses – When business turnover is down >30%

JobKeeper Payments – In an attempt to encourage businesses to continue to retain their staff, the government will pay businesses $1,500 per fortnight (per eligible employee) for them to pass onto their employees as a salary.  The full amount of this must be passed through to the employee, irrespective of whether they were earning less than the $1,500 per fortnight before (i.e. if you employed someone part time, and their income was say $1,000 per fortnight, the employer must then pay them $1,500 per fortnight as part of this arrangement). 

Code of Conduct for Commercial Tenancies – In light of the financial impact on business, the Government has set down a mandatory code of conduct between landlords and businesses who have been impacted by COVID-19 to a large enough extent that they are eligible for the JobKeeper payments.  This means that a landlord must engage with the business (tenant) to come to an agreement on rent. 

South Australia Emergency Grant for Small Business – The SA government is providing emergency grants of $10,000 for small businesses that have been “highly impacted” by COVID-19.  This grant is more restrictive than the Australian Government Grant, as some of the requirements are that the business has turnover of at least $75,000, maximum annual payroll of $1.5m and so forth.  The SA Government has said that those businesses that are eligible for the “JobKeeper” Payment will be deemed to have been “highly impacted” (the other conditions will still apply).  I assume that there may be scope to prove that if your turnover is not down 30%, that you may be able to detail how you are “highly impacted” to still gain access to this grant.



For Employees who have lost their job or are looking for a job

JobSeeker Payment – The Government has loosened the requirements to access the JobSeeker Payment (for those looking for work), so that people can obtain the benefit sooner, and that they can obtain it with less asset testing restrictions. 

In addition to the standard JobSeeker payment for those seeking work, those eligible will also receive a $550 per fortnight ‘Coronavirus supplement’ on top of the JobSeeker payment.

Early Access to Super – If you have met one of the following conditions:

  • Being unemployed, or
  • Being eligible for the JobSeeker Payment, Youth Allowance for job seekers, Parenting Payment, Special Benefit or Farm Household allowance, or
  • On or after 1 January 2020
    • You were made redundant, or
    • Your working hours reduced by 20 percent or more, or
    • If you are a sole trader who has had their business suspended or had a reduction in turnover of 20% or more

Then, irrespective of age, you may be eligible to withdraw up to $10,000 from your superannuation tax free before 1st July 2020, and then up to another $10,000 between 1st July 2020 and 24th September 2020.



For individuals receiving certain Government Pensions or Allowances

Economic Support Payment – For individuals who are in receipt of one or more of a number of different Government Benefits, including (but not limited to) the Aged Pension, Disability Support Pension, Carer Allowance, Family Tax Benefit or Austudy, they will receive two rounds of the Economic Support payment.

Additionally, if someone holds a Commonwealth Seniors Health Care Card, Pensioner Concession Card or receives a Department of Veterans Affairs Pension (plus a few other less common items), they too will receive this payment.

The payment will come in the form of a $750 payment that eligible people would have already received or will receive by the end of the coming week, plus a second $750 payment that will be paid from 13th July 2020 on-wards.  Note however that you won’t receive the second payment if you are in receipt of the above mentioned ‘Coronavirus supplement’.


I hope that the above has helped to explain some of the many ways the Government is assisting everyone to financially get through the COVID-19 situation.  Naturally there are a number of requirements for accessing the above items, so please feel free to call or email with any queries you may have.

Regards

David Kayser

Post Election Summary

Well I certainly didn’t see that coming!

Like a lot of the country I was extremely surprised by the Election results on the weekend.

As such, my planned summary of what we should be expecting to see changed under a new Government has needed to be ‘reworked’ shall we say.

Instead of a long list of changes relating to Income Tax, Capital Gains Tax, Franking Credits and Superannuation contribution limits, the new reality is that it’ll just be a continuation of what we already have (hopefully without any leadership challenges though…).

The only significant changes (from a tax & superannuation perspective) that are due to come in are:

1. A Tax Offset (reduction in tax) of up to $1,080 for singles or up to $2,160 for dual income families that’ll apply for the current financial year (yes, the year that is about to finish) through to 2021/22. Income earners up to $126,000 in taxable income will benefit from this change.

2. An increase in the ability of small businesses to immediately write off purchases for their business up to the value of $30,000, thereby reducing the cash flow consequences of buying plant and equipment to improve and grow their businesses.

Separate to that there is the last minute announcement of the ‘First Home Buyer Scheme’ that was made just over a week ago, however the details on this are still very thin, so we will need to wait and see what appears.

Other than that, it appears it’s just going to be ‘business as usual’, except probably for the guy at Sportsbet that made the decision to pay out on a Labor victory two days before the vote. I’m guessing he’s looking for a new job by now.

The stock market has been happy with the outcome today. So far it is up 1.5%, with the private health insurers up around 10% (no longer subject to the prospect of tighter controls on premium increases), and banks up around 7% (investors happy to buy them to collect the dividends and claim back their franking credits).

Finally, with all the words and pictures written online in the last 48 hours, I think the below meme perhaps sums up best what Australia has thought:

Chris Bowen

As always, if you have any queries, please feel free to call or email.

Regards

David

Royal Commission – welcome to a world of higher costs and more paperwork

In case you missed it, the findings of the Banking Royal Commission were handed down earlier this week.

Given that early on Tuesday, the following were the movements in the ‘Big 4’ banks on our share market (up 4.8% to 7.6%), I think you’ll agree that the ‘market’ thinks that the banks have escaped very lightly indeed.

Banks

It’s important to remember that the banks (and AMP) were the ones that were caught charging fees for no service, and providing bad advice.

I believe that the share prices have jumped so much, because (a) they have essentially gotten away with a ‘slap on the wrist’ for their greed and/or incompetence, and (b), in what can only be described as a brain fade, the Royal Commissioner has recommended that the entire Mortgage Broker business structure be turned on it’s head. Currently around 60% of the mortgages written in the country are done by mortgage brokers, who compare banks and other lenders for the best deal. If these people’s ability to earn a living disappears, it can only lead to less competition, higher prices and a win for the big banks. This is extremely bad policy, and I wish the mortgage broker industry the best in trying to make the government see sense and not implement this recommendation.

I am glad I’m not a mortgage broker having to have this fight!

I know that there has been a lot of media coverage on the report, so I don’t want to re-hash all of the information here, however I did think it was worthwhile to point out some of the relevant items from a financial advice perspective that will unfortunately increase red tape and drive up costs:

* There will be a requirement for an annual sign off on all advice ongoing fee arrangements between Financial Advisers and Clients.
My response – Whilst I have no issue with having these sorts of agreements in place, as has always been the case, any client can stop paying for advice whenever they choose. So with the exception of this stopping rouge advisers who do nothing for their ongoing fees (not how I operate), all this does is create more red tape and more work for the (vast majority of) advisers who are working as hard as they can for their clients every day.

* Disclosure of “Lack of Independence” to all clients in writing before providing them with advice.
My response – This is a joke. Under the law, if just one client pays me via an insurance policy or super fund, I cannot call myself “independent”. So because of this I will now need to tell everyone that I “Lack Independence”. As I read somewhere yesterday, I look forward to my hairdresser also telling me that she is not independent as she gets paid by me….
Just more paperwork…..
Does a client benefit from this – no..

* There is to be another review of advice in three year’s time.
My response – Sounds like more work for lawyers to me. No doubt it’ll create more red tape..

* Removal of “Grandfathered Commissions”
My response – These commissions are things that exist on older accounts that are really not used anymore (generally only held if there is say something like an attached insurance policy there which can’t be moved due to medical reason). Fundamentally I don’t have a problem with this, however I’d first want to be assured that any benefits flow through to end consumers, and are not kept by the banks that run these products.

* Changes to Life Insurance Commissions
My response – this was proposed a few years ago, and after much debate and consultation the end result was that Australians are vastly under-insured, and the removal of this as a method of paying for advice on insurance would only worsen the situation. It’ll be interesting to see where this finishes up this time.

* ASIC & APRA (the two governing bodies of the financial industry) are to have another government body above them to monitor their work.
My response – Wow, how crazy can it get, putting another government body on top of the existing ones.
Just more red tape and costs for the taxpayer..

Anyway, enough from me. I think it is good that we had the Royal Commission, and I am glad that it has put the blow torch on some of the bad eggs in the industry (just as any industry/profession has bad eggs), I just think it is very disappointing that those who were caught (i.e. the Banks), appear to have gotten away so well, and the rest of us will be forced to pay for it via increased red tape, which will lead to increased costs, and which unfortunately could put the price of advice outside the reach of those who need it most.

On a related topic, if you haven’t already seen it, the below is a link to the Commissioner refusing to shake hands when handing over the Royal Commission’s report. I’m not sure what if anything had gone on behind the scenes before this, however my interpretation is that Mr Hayne was just straight out rude or arrogant – isn’t it just common manners to shake hands? Perhaps my parents just raised me better than him – thanks Mum & Dad 🙂

No Handshake

So with that said, thanks for reading, and if you have any queries please feel free to call or email.

Regards,

David Kayser

2018/19 Federal Budget Update

Are we there yet….

Not quite, but we are getting close. Just as I’ve being saying for quite some time, our economy is travelling along pretty well. This ‘feel’ for how things have been going has now really started to show up in the profits businesses are earning, and as a follow on of that in the taxes that they are paying.

This has then resulted in the Federal Government being in the fortunate position of sharply increasing tax revenues (to the tune of $6 billion extra income than was expected in December last year), which in turn has meant that we are all the more closer to having a balanced budget (i.e. ‘are we there yet’), after a decade of deficits which has seen our government debt blow out from $0 to around $340 billion.

So what does a government do when the numbers are starting to look like they will be back in the black, they start spending of course.

Whilst ordinarily I would like to see us get back in the black first, this time I wholeheartedly agree with what they are doing, and that is that the government is looking to keep it’s foot on the accelerator to ensure that the economy keeps growing. After all, we need a growing economy to pay for the services that we all expect.

Have they spent it in the right areas, well everyone will have their own opinion on what is the highest priority, so I’ll leave that analysis for everyone to make themselves.

Obviously the budget is just a wish list of what the government wants to do, and it has to get their proposals legislated, but if we assume (yes, that’s a huge assumption) that their proposals come into effect, then the below is how I would break down the positives and negatives:

Positive No. 1 – Reduce the impact of ‘bracket creep’
I’m not going to comment on whether the ‘right’ people are being relieved of some of the effects of bracket creep (where you pay more tax on your income primarily as a result of inflation pushing your income up), but it is good to see that the 37% personal tax bracket will only start to kick in from an income of $90,000 (instead of $87,000) from 1/7/18.

Positive No. 2 – Assistance to Lower Income Earners
This proposal will result in a new tax offset being available to assist anyone earning under $125,333 to reduce their tax. The media is all abuzz with this this morning about people complaining how the “$10 a week” tax reduction is so small etc etc. I personally think people should stop complaining, and realise that $530 a year (the maximum someone can receive) is something that they didn’t have before, and just be happy with it. As I said earlier there will always be people with different views on what is the most important thing to do, and if someone is so upset about receiving the $530, then perhaps they can donate it to charity, as I know there are many people who have had to put up with increasing costs like electricity and gas, who will be very happy about this extra cash in their pocket.

Positive No. 3 – Big movements in the personal tax scales in the future
I won’t write too much on this one as I believe it’ll have a hard time getting legislated, but essentially, the government is proposing to ‘flatten out the tax scales’, meaning that the 32.5% tax rate will cover a lot wider range of incomes, and the 37% scale will disappear altogether. See below for the proposed changes:

Proposed Tax Scales
Proposed Tax Scales

Positive No. 4 – Protecting Small Super Balances
The government is proposing that exit fees be banned on all super fund. Whilst most funds nowadays do not charge exit fees (or if they do they are relatively small), it’ll be great to see these fees removed from ‘old legacy type’ super funds, which have in the past being able to hold the member captive in the fund unless they wanted to pay these exit fees.

Positive No. 5 – Extending the Small Business Instant Asset Write Off
This has now been extended for a few years running, so it is great to see that small businesses will be able to continue to claim an immediate tax deduction for assets costing up to $20,000 – hence, if they need to buy new computers or machinery they can get the tax deduction in the year they buy it, rather than having to wait and claim it over a number of years.

Positive No. 6 – Extending the Pension Loan Scheme
This is effectively a reverse mortgage on a pensioners house. It allows an aged pensioner to effectively draw down on their equity over time to assist them in meeting their cost of living. The maximum combined Aged Pension and Pension Loan will now be 150% of the maximum Aged Pension – i.e. if you receive the full Aged Pension, you can also draw down another 50% of this amount against your home.

Positive No. 7 – Money for Medical Research
This one is certainly not on the front page of the papers across the country, but buried away in the details of the budget is that more money will be allocated to support medical research. I strongly believe that this is a great program. Not only may it improve people’s lives who are living with various diseases, but it is also a way of creating highly skilled jobs in Australia, which we can only hope leads to great new technologies that our country can earn a royalty from (i.e. like the CSIRO did with WiFi & CSL with the HPV vaccine).

Negative No. 1 – ‘Opt-In’ for Life Insurance in Super
I’m going to be a little controversial here. This is being written up in the media as a positive, in that super fund members under 25 or those with small super balances will need to specifically request that their super fund holds insurance for them, rather than it being the default that the fund automatically provides insurance for them (yes, at a cost, albeit quite a minor cost at younger ages).

The reason this is a negative is that I know from assisting numerous people who have become sick, injured, or passed away young, that this insurance (that quite often they didn’t even know that they had) has been a massive financial windfall for them, and has greatly assisted their families when these unfortunate events occur.

Negative No. 2 – ???
Again, I’ll perhaps be a little controversial here, but I’m going with there isn’t another major negative that I have discovered in the budget papers as yet.

As I mentioned earlier there may be things that are in different positions on someone’s personal priority list (i.e. should tax cuts come before increases in Newstart, or should tax cuts be targeted to a different group of people etc) – but with the exception of the ordering of priorities, I believe that this is a pretty good budget, that is designed to keep the economy growing so that we as a country can afford to pay for the services that we expect over our lifetime.

So, from where I sit, that seems to be the main points (there may be more to follow as I read it all in more detail).

There are of course many other announcements, most of which are minor in detail, and as such I won’t go into them here.

So with that said, thanks for reading, and if you have any queries please feel free to call or email.

Regards,

David Kayser

On this day 30 year’s ago

October 19th, 1987, or Black Monday as it has become known, was the day of the 1987 stock market crash (well actually it was 19th October in the USA, and 20th October in Australia, but let’s go with the date it started overseas).

The US market dropped 23%, the biggest single day fall in the US Stock Market’s history. The Australian market fell even more (25%).

Since that time there have been other, larger in dollar term falls, but the 1987 one was still the largest single day percentage fall by quite some distance.

The causes of the 1987 crash are still debated to this day, but the main reasons appear to be:
* Computer program trading, which was set to try and automatically exit stock positions when markets started to fall (which instead just added to the fall), and
* Overvaluation of shares, which is easy to see in hindsight, but not as easy to see at the time.

One thing that is interesting, is that even though there was a 23% fall on 19/10/1987, the US Dow Jones index still returned 2.26% for the 1987 year (i.e. it had a massive increase in value in the lead up to October). Hence, if you look at the full year, it is nowhere near as bad as the headlines say.

So what are the key things to learn from the 1987 crash (and others that have followed)? We I think the key points are as follows:
* We should take a moment to remind ourselves that stock markets are there for long term investing, not short term gambling.
* The real money is made by investing in quality businesses that compound their earnings over time.
* After markets crash, they also recover, so having some spare ‘fire power’ on the sidelines is always a good thing.
* We should pay less attention to short term media talk, and rather focus on the long term. Whether your shares go up 1% or down 2% today is irrelevant, what we want is something that will appreciate (and/or paid good dividends) over multiple years.

Regards

David

Is it really worth it?

In my job I see a lot of offers to buy shares in companies. Some of them great, some OK, and some that you just open up the paperwork and then run a mile!

Today I received one of the ‘run a mile’ ones.

A fairly new business (who will remain nameless) is looking for more equity to continue their growth. The prospectus shows that last financial year they had revenue from trading activities of $137,000. Well done to them – it was 13% above the previous year’s revenue. Only problem was that it’s expenses were ~$2,078,000…… (15 times it’s revenue….).

So what’s this business worth? According to the prospectus the business is apparently worth $18.5 million! For those of you interested in financial ratios, that’s ~135 times revenue.

I honestly hope they succeed as a business, but it’s certainly not one that I’m interested in investing it.

Keep it simple, keep it safe, & be careful what you buy!!